EPA Resolves Longstanding Litigation to Protect Endangered Species
This week, the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) resolved longstanding litigation covering over 1,000 pesticide products, allowing EPA to fulfill its obligations to protect endangered species while conducting reviews and approvals of pesticides in a safe and protective manner. In 2011, the Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network (Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in Federal Court in California against EPA alleging that it was violating the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when it registered or reevaluated the registration of 382 pesticide active ingredients, which was ultimately reduced to 35 active ingredients covering over 1,000 pesticide products containing one or more of these active ingredients. This became known as the “megasuit” because of the number of pesticides it covered. The settlement entered by the Court this week resolves all outstanding claims.
“This agreement is a win-win-win to protect endangered species, ensure the availability of pesticides needed to grow food across America, and save considerable time and taxpayer expenses required to further litigate this case,” said Assistant Administrator for EPA’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Michal Freedhoff.
In 2022, EPA issued its ESA Workplan, Balancing Wildlife Protection and Responsible Pesticide Use: How EPA’s Pesticide Program Will Meet its Endangered Species Act Obligations, which describes how EPA will address the challenge of protecting ESA-listed species from pesticides. This settlement is consistent with EPA’s ongoing efforts to develop a multichemical, multispecies approach to meeting its ESA obligations under the workplan. EPA’s traditional chemical-by-chemical, species-by-species approach to meeting these obligations has been slow and costly, with ESA work on each pesticide typically taking many years to complete. As a result, EPA has completed its ESA obligations for less than 5% of its actions, creating legal vulnerabilities, the potential for adverse impacts to listed species, and uncertainty for farmers and other pesticide users that use many pesticides. Resolving the remaining claims in this lawsuit and establishing a path forward under the settlement is a significant step to overcoming these challenges.
This agreement and the prior partial settlement include obligations for EPA as follows:
- Development of mitigation measures for listed species that are particularly vulnerable to exposures from pesticides and determine how to apply these mitigations to future pesticide actions, as well as whether this Vulnerable Species Pilot should be expanded to more species.
- Development and implementation of an Herbicide Strategy (draft released for public comment), a Rodenticide Strategy, Insecticide Strategy, and Fungicide strategy (the latter three are still under development) which will identify mitigation measures for entire classes of pesticides to address their potential impacts to hundreds of ESA-listed species
- Completion of the ESA work for eight organophosphates and four rodenticides;
- Hosting of a workshop for stakeholders to explore how to offset pesticide impacts on ESA-listed species in situations where eliminating or modifying pesticide use may not be feasible, and how EPA could incorporate those offsets into its process for registering or reregistering pesticides. Offsets could include restoring wetland habitat or funding breeding programs for affected species.
We will have to see how this plays out, because “the devil is in the details.” What are the mitigation measures and how are the pilot projects impacting farming operations are couple of questions that immediately rise to the top when reviewing EPA’s announcement.
Welcome to WAPA
Governor Signs Ag Overtime Bill
Ignoring the pleas of real farmworkers and the agricultural industry, Governor Edmund G. Brown Jr. today
signed AB 1066, the ag overtime legislation. This means that California will have the most stringent trigger
of any state in the country for overtime for farmworkers, with 45 states having no overtime protection at
all. The Governor signed this bill, supposedly to bring “equality to all workers”, yet taxi cab drivers,
commercial fishermen, car salesmen, student nurses, computer programmers, and carnival workers all work
without any overtime provisions whatsoever. The Governor signed this ag overtime bill in the same year that
minimum wage legislation was also passed that will take California to the highest minimum wage as well as
legislation forcing California to adopt additional greenhouse gas regulations for businesses in California.
California is the only state in the country subject to such regulations. Today’s signing occurred despite
numerous requests by the agricultural industry to meet with the Governor to discuss our concerns. The
message is clear. California simply doesn’t care. These provisions will be phased in over the next few years
ending with the overtime provisions to be triggered at 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week.
In the Beginning
As folks transitioned out of cotton and into tree nuts, the industry recognized the need to have active and
effective representation at the local, state and national levels. Having enjoyed such effective
representation over the years from the California Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations, these folks
yearned for the same representation in the tree nut processing industry. Issues such as air quality, food
safety, labor, taxes, employee safety, and environmental concerns are at the forefront, and there is a
significant need for an aggressive and dynamic Association to lead the industry into the next decade and
beyond. In recognition of this, the Western Agricultural Processors Association was created in 2009.
The Western Agricultural Processors Association (WAPA) shares staff and office space with the California
Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations taking advantage of a unique and opportunistic situation. WAPA is a
voluntary dues organization with four shared staff and one dedicated staff person. Regulatory, legislative
and legal issues fall under the purview of this new organization for the tree nut processing industry, which
includes almonds, pecans, pistachios and walnuts. From air quality permits to conditional use permits, from
regulatory hearings on greenhouse gases to federal legislation on food safety, and from OSHA violations to
assisting members on hazardous materials business plans, no issue is too small or too large for WAPA. WAPA
has assembled one of the best and most capable staffs in the industry, and the results are already starting
to show
Membership
The Western Agricultural Processors Association represents facilities involved in the processing of almonds,
pecans, pistachios and walnuts.Membership in the Association is classified as Regular memberships are
limited to almond hullers or processors, pecan and pistachio processors, and walnut dehydrators and
processors.
Associate memberships are limited to any individual or business entity which is not engaged in agricultural
processing, but which provides products or services directly related to the agricultural processing
industry. WAPA Associate members include, but are not limited to, commodity brokers, accounting firms, and
insurance brokers.
Organization
The Western Agricultural Processors Association is governed by a Board of Directors, elected by its
membership.The Board consists of up to 15 members from throughout the state, and throughout the industry.The
Board meets on a quarterly basis and conducts an Annual Meeting in the spring of each year.WAPA, in
conjunction with the California Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations, conducts a special training school
for its members focused on safety.In combination with the school, the Association holds a Labor Management
Seminar for all of the managers.
Consulting Services
In researching and considering the concept of forming a new organization, the Boards of Directors for the
California Cotton Ginners and Growers Associations instructed staff to perform some of the work on a
consulting basis first. The point was to determine the workload from consulting and to determine if there
was sufficient interest. In November of 2007, the Association began conducting services under consulting
contracts for such services as air quality permits and safety plans.The effort has been so successful that
demand has progressed outside the tree nut industry into other agricultural processing facilities, including
vegetable dehydration facilities, tomato processing facilities, and wheat mills, as well as cotton gins in
Arizona.It was determined by the new Board of Directors of WAPA, that WAPA would maintain the consulting
services to provide offsetting income to help with the expenses of getting the new organization up and
running.Today, WAPA provides for a long list of satisfied clients in the agricultural processing industry,
by providing critical services such as air quality, safety, food safety, and environmental issues (Hazardous
Materials Business Plan, Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure Plans, etc.).